DOE Awards $43 Million for Battery Tech

By · August 02, 2012

Ford Fusion Energi

The Ford Fusion Energi plug-in hybrid, seen here at its debut in Detroit, was launched with a little help from ARPA-E. (Jim Motavalli photo)

For 19 companies, research centers and universities, Thursday was the day their government ship came in. The Department of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), launched in 2009 to fund “breakthrough” technology, announced $43 million in grants (actually, “cooperative research agreements”) to further electric vehicle and smart grid technologies.

Some $13 million went to seven projects aimed at pursuing “cutting-edge energy storage developments for stationary power and electric vehicles.” The other $30 million aims to maximize the potential of existing battery technology.

A big question here is whether these grants will be seen as what they are--legitimate funding of science--and not get highly politicized. The failure of solar producer Solyndra (which got $500 million) in an election year has created a poisonous atmosphere for clean tech government funding.

Raking in the Moolah

Among the EV battery recipients were: GE Global Research ($3.1 million), Ford (also $3.1 million), the Palo Alto Research Center ($4 million) and Oak Ridge National Laboratories ($4 million). Universities raking in cash are Penn State, Utah State (which got $3 million for power management of large packs) and Washington University in St. Louis.

The terms of the grants are highly technical (GE will “develop thin-film sensors that enable real-time, two-dimensional mapping of temperature and surface pressure for each cell within a battery pack”), but all aimed at improving the range, cost and general attractiveness of electric cars as a consumer product.

Eric Toone, acting head of ARPA-E and principal deputy director, was candid in an interview about what he’d like to see the grants accomplish. “We want to enable the deployment of EVs, and that includes addressing battery cost and energy density, range anxiety and safety.” Much of the work is centered on making the dominant lithium-ion tech work better, but Toone also sounded encouraging words about lithium-air and lithium-sulfur chemistries, as well as further-out solid-state batteries (with no liquid catalyst).

“There are some chemistries that have huge potential to achieve beyond far lithium-ion,” Toone said. “We’ve looked at solid-state batteries, and they certainly could prove important, but they have a longer timeline and are not currently a focus.”

DOE's Success Story

ARPA-E likes success stories, and one of them—at least potentially—is about its grant recipient Envia Systems, which startled the known world by announcing that not only could its lithium-ion battery packs greatly increase range and cut costs in half, but they’d be in cars in a relatively short time frame.

The company’s CEO, Atul Kapadia, told me last February that its cells will cost 45 percent of those available today, will weigh less and have almost triple the energy density. “We will be able to make smaller automotive packs that are also less heavy and much cheaper,” he said.

Envia battery technology

Envia's technical secrets: A big government thumbs up. (Envia photo)

The claim lacked a government thumbs up, but Toone is more than willing to supply it. “Envia definitely has had a battery breakthrough,” he said. “And they’re far along. The batteries have to be tested and deployed, and there is still a great amount of work to do, but they’ve moved beyond the bench scale.”

I asked Toone for a five-year horizon: What will be on the road in 2018? “Certainly in five years we’ll see a number of battery chemistries—the palate of solutions will be much larger than today. Will we see a Leaf with metal-air batteries? I certainly can’t say that with confidence.”

On the slow rate of EV adoption, Toone counsels patience. “It took Toyota 14 years to sell two million hybrids,” he said. “You have to start somewhere. I applaud Chevrolet and Nissan for being pioneers in the space.”

Critics who’ve accused the government of picking favorites (and sometimes favoring specific regions, such as Michigan, in the awarding of previous federal battery awards) should know that ARPA-E is determinedly non-partisan. “We are extraordinarily apolitical,” he said. “It’s a real techie bunch here. The people come from industry and academia to serve their country for a few years, and then go home.”

Ford received $10 million in DOE research funds in 2009 to develop a fleet of 20 plug-in hybrids. The money appears to have borne fruit, because Ford has PHEV versions of the Fusion and C-MAX now.

Ford said that for the latest grant it will partner with a Texas company, Arbin Instruments, to develop a high-tech battery life testing and monitoring device that will approve diagnostics in pack development.

Toone told the Detroit Free Press, “If you look at the total amount of storage space that there is in a battery, and then you start knocking stuff out for safety, security…by the time all is said and done, you’re only using a quarter to a third of the space in a battery.” The Ford tool would allow a larger part of the battery to be used or actually powering the car. “I think you’re talking about at least doubling” the efficiency of a battery, he told the paper.

Comments

· Anonymous (not verified) · 2 years ago

You hit the nail on the head. More taxpayer money, why does this always have to be done with taxpayer money. We are 16 trillion in debt. Does anybody understand what that means. We do not have the capability to ever even come close to paying this amount off.

I'm all for R&D with private funds and even public in moderation, which solyndra was not. If you want inject politics solyndra was totally political. A half billion dollars to one company? Only one word STUPID.

Don't get me wrong I'm all for alternative energy this is not just a liberal issue. I'm not a liberal and I have a very open mind to alternative energy that makes common since. I'm also for everything else until we get there. Nat gas, hydrogen,... I'm also very interested in the Chevy Volt. We are all interested in saving money and not lining the pockets of the Middle East. We should not be just investing in only Battery and solar but Nat gas, hydrogen, and other viable technologies. The goal should be all American.

Concerned citizen

· TD (not verified) · 2 years ago

FWIW, this is the way basic research has been funded since the Apollo space program. The internet was born from such a grant. Thousands and thousands of projects have been funded with grants from DOE, DARPA/ARPA, NASA and JPL. But you're right we should stop investing in the future, because we've hit an economic slump. Of course, we have to hope our economic competitors will stand still and wait for us.

· · 2 years ago

We've actually witnessed government funding for scientific and engineering research that directly affects the positive aspects of private enterprise and our personal lives farther back in time than the manned space program, TD. And, yes, we're delusional to think we can simply stop and expect everyone else in the world to suddenly become Tea Party Hillbillies, simply because half the house of Representatives thinks we should.

So much to say about Solyndra. The Wikipedia article seems very neutral and even-handed in its appraisal . . .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solyndra

Note that Solyndra was developing a rather cutting edge PV collector and largely got in trouble when the price of mainstream PV panel unexpectedly dropped, as the market became flooded with them. Solyndra's technology wasn't inferior and we might see the benefits of their research in years to come. The price came about for the same amount of money it cost the Department of Defense to purchase about 2 of the F-22 aircraft . . . a Cold War era weapon system we're still funding.

I'm not sure which particular Faux News bulletins you're subscribing to, anonymous, but all that you mention in regards to energy technology IS garnering government research grants and loans. The one that I can bring up from memory is the 68 billion dollars that hydrogen gets each year, simply because a well-know fellow poster here on Plug In Cars keeps declaring it's not being funded and continually has to be reminded that it is.

· Rick (not verified) · 1 year ago

This is all well and good! But remember that Chevron holds the patent for large format NiMH batts. These were used in the gen2 EV1 that got 150 mi range between charges.GM sold the patent to Chevron . Remember that Big Oil always kills its enemies.

· sarvsammat (not verified) · 1 year ago

Nice post. I like this post very much.
http://iphone games

New to EVs? Start here

  1. What Is An Electric Car?
    Before we get going, let's establish basic definitions.
  2. A Quick Guide to Plug-in Hybrids
    Some plug-in cars have back-up engines to extend driving range.
  3. Electric Cars Pros and Cons
    EVs are a great solution for most people. But not everybody.
  4. Eight Rules of Electric Vehicle Charging Etiquette
    Thou shalt charge only when necessary. And other rules to live by.
  5. Seven Things To Know About Buying a Plug-In Car
    A few simple tips before you visit the dealership.
  6. Eight Factors Determining Total Cost of Ownership of an Electric Car
    EVs get bad rap as expensive. Until you look at TCO.
  7. Federal and Local Incentives for Plug-in Hybrids and Electric Cars
    Take advantage of credits and rebates to reduce EV costs.
  8. Guide to Buying First Home EV Charger
    You'll want a home charger. Here's how to buy the right one.
  9. Electric Car Utility Rate Plans: Top Five Rules
    With the right utility plan, electric fuel can be dirt cheap.
  10. The Ultimate Guide to Electric Car Charging Networks
    If you plan to charge in public, you'll want to sign up for charging network membership (or two).